|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
somebody wrote:
> In fact, even as an atheist, I don't think the argument from evil is a
> particularly strong one. For evil is a sliding scale.
So you're making exactly the argument of "well, the world doesn't really
contain evil after all," which is exactly the phrasing I found interestin
g
in the article.
You're doing the Descartes bit here. "In order to know good, we must know
evil first." I think the fact that we *can* imagine things like Event
Horizon means we have a pretty good idea of a sliding scale of evil. What
if
the "bad smell objectors" imagined Event Horizon and our world too. Would
n't
they conclude the evil isn't all that bad?
> I would counter that what we perceive as evil are simply foul
> smells.
"bulk of the discussion then becomes a matter of theists arguing that
actually, the world’s pretty great, the evil things in it are per
fectly
justified and necessary,"
--
Darren New, San Diego CA, USA (PST)
I ordered stamps from Zazzle that read "Place Stamp Here".
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |